The aristocratic Alpish North Africans

September 26, 2005

Arabs are a long-headed Orientalid race, but the aristocracy is often more Alpish than the commoners who are standard dolichocephals.

‘Although the Alpine-looking Hejaz type may not yet be established on a scientific basis, its existence will be confirmed by readers who are acquainted with the people of this region. It seems very likely that men of this general type went to North Africa with the early Moslem invasions, for this type is frequent among the aristocratic families in North African cities, particularly in Fez, in contrast with the rest of the population which is almost exclusively dolichocephalic’.

CS Coon, Races of Europe, page 409.

Albert Einstein: Alpish genius

September 22, 2005

ALBERT Einstein was an Alpish genius of Central European Jewish origins.

Charles Nordmann, quoted in Ronald W. Clark, Einstein, p. 352.

‘His skull is clearly, and to an extraordinary degree, brachycephalic, great in breadth and receding towards the nape of the neck without exceeding the vertical…The skull of Einstein reminds me, above all else, of that of Renan, who was also a brachycephale. As with Renan the forehad is huge; its breadth exceptional, its spherical form striking one more than its height.’

The Alpish dynastic race of Egypt

EGYPT is a southern country and its population was originally narrow-headed, Mediterranean White and Black. The creators of Egyptian civilisation were predominantly Alpish brachycephals, belonging to a foreign race that subjugated the dolichocephals. Egypt is one of many lands where broadheads replaced and subjugated the narrowheads.

The Cambridge Ancient History, 1971, p. 40.

‘Anthropological research may some day shed much-needed light on what was perhaps the most important of the migrations by establishing the identity of the so-called ‘Armenoids’ or ‘Dynastic Race’, whose presence in Egypt at the beginning of the dynastic period, although discounted by many authorities in the past, has been further attested by recent excavations. Physically these people differed unmistakably from the predynastic Egyptians: whereas the latter were unusually small in stature and possessed long and narrow skulls (about 132 mm. in breadth), the newcomers were more massively built and their skulls (about 139 mm. in width) were appreciably broader than those of their predecessors.’

The Alpish Hungarian overlords

USUALLY the uppermost stratum of society is composed of Alpish race-types. The middle stratum is composed of athletic narrowheads (Mediterranids and Nordids) and the lower stratum of gracile types. This paper proves this for Hungary.

‘Another new aspect in his investigations was implied in
providing an anthropological analysis of the conquering
Hungarians according to three layers of society (Lipták
1983). According to his observations, the “overlords” were
characterized by Turanid, Uralian and Pamir race elements
and also by certain long-headed components. The “middle
layer” or “warriors’ layer”, however, showed an anthropological
profile distinctly different from that of the overlords.
It was essentially constituted by Mediterraneans, Nordoids
(who might also have been tall robust Mediterraneans) and
Pamir component while the absence of Turanid and Uralian
race characteristics was remarkable. As regards the third
layer, the so-called “common folk”, they were dominated,
just as the middle layer was, by Mediterranean and Nordoid
elements but, in addition, the Cromagnoid ones were also
significant.’

The Alpish Hittite overlords

THE overlord type at the top of the racial hierarchy in many human societies was Alpish.

Merlin Stone, When God Was a Woman, p. 93

‘According to Professor Gurney, “Examination of the skulls which have been found on several sites in Anatolia shows that in the third millennia BC the population were preponderantly long-headed or doliocephalic [Mediterranean] with only a small admixture of brachycephalic [Alpine] types. In the second millennium the proportion of brachycephalic skulls increases to about 50%.”

It was these brachycephalic or Alpine people who eventually came to be known as the ruling class of the Hittite Empire.’

The White or Caucasian race

August 28, 2005

THE White or Caucasian race occupies the western lands of the Old World, north of the Sahara and west of the Ural Mountains. It spills into the Oriental race to the east, to the Australian race towards southern India and to the Negro race across the Sahara desert and the Red Sea.

The Whites have several traits in common, the most important being:

  • Fine, soft hair, straight to lightly curled.
  • Fine textured, pale to light brown skin.
  • Brown to blue eyes; blackish brown to white-blond hair.
  • Projecting, high rooted, and relatively narrow nose.
  • Projecting upper facial skeleton, jutting well in front of the line of the cheekbones, which are -correspondingly- retracted.
  • Hairy body and especially face in the normal adult male.

The White or Caucasian race is also known as Homo europaeus, Homo albus, Caucasia varietas, Caucasoid race, Europid race, Europoid race, Europeoid race. Despite differences in usage, these names are practically synonyms for the White race.

Berbers

Kashmiris

Norwegians

The Four races: their origin and identity

HOMO sapiens is divided into four major races: White, Negro, Oriental, and Australian. There are other races as well, e.g., Negrito or Pygmy, but the Big Four make up 99+% of the species.

The White race has fair skin, fine, soft wavy hair, long beards in its men, prominent faces and noses.

The Negro race has dark skin, woolly black hair, protruding mouths, and flat faces and noses.

The Oriental race has yellowish skin, coarse straight black hair, flat faces with strong cheekbones, flat noses and heavy eyefolds.

The Australian race has brown skin, wavy hair, protruding mouths, angular skulls and a jutting glabella, which is the part of the forehead just above the eyes.

The White race evolved in West Asia and spread into Europe, Central Asia, Northern and Eastern Africa and India.

The Negro race evolved in Sub-Saharan Africa.

The Oriental race evolved in northern China and Siberia and spread throughout Eastern and Southeastern Asia, and in the New World.

The White race is energetic, bellicose, and creative. It has been the most important race in human history, and is responsible for most inventions and scientific achievements.

The Negro race is cheerful and unrestrained. It has been isolated from civisation, and only now begins to contribute to it, mainly in White nations where Negroes were formerly used as slaves.

The Oriental race is restrained and serious. It has been quite civilised, and is responsible for many innovations. It is intelligent but not very creative.

The Australian race resembles the Negro race, but has not made any contributions to civilisation.

An introduction to Alpish racial science

HELLO, my name is Quintus Valerius Priscus. I live in London, England. I study racial science in my spare time. Racial science is the branch of anthropology dealing with the group structure of normal human variation. A racial scientist compares the distribution of traits and abilities in different groups of normal, i.e., non-pathological individuals. He differs from a racist in that he does not believe that any group is superior to any other; he does, however, believe that a group may be superior to another on average with respect to certain traits or abilities. He differs from an egalitarian in that he does not believe that human individuals and groups are equivalent, their differences being accidents of luck or environment with no innate component; he does, however, believe that they should be awarded equal rights and respect.

I believe that humans can be divided into several races, the most important being White, Negro, Oriental, and Australian. The White or Caucasian race can be divided into three major ‘race-circles’: Northern or Nordish, Central or Alpish, and Southern or Sudish. This blog is dedicated to the Alpish race-circle; I believe that Alpish humanity is very important and represents -in more ways than one- what is best in our species. This does not sound politically correct, and it is not meant to be. I aim to convince the reader that my claim is true. You will realise that an objective assessment of the evidence allows no other conclusion. I hope that you will read on, and make up your own mind.